Prediction of Adam Chadaj vs Jonas Eriksson Ziverts Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Chadaj vs J. Eriksson Ziverts

Adam Chadaj
POL
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
41
Age
26
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
0
202
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$19.4K
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
SWE
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
41
Age
26
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
0
202
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$19.4K
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Chadaj 1 - 0 Ziverts
They have played 2 sets in total, with Adam Chadaj winning 2 and Jonas Eriksson Ziverts winning 0. The last match between Adam Chadaj and Jonas Eriksson Ziverts was at the Poland F2 (Gdynia), 20-06-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Adam Chadaj getting the victory 7-5 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chadaj | 1 |
| Ziverts | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Poland F2 (Gdynia)(06-20-17)
Adam Chadaj
7
7
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
5
6
A. Chadaj vs J. E. Ziverts H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $19,360 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.66% (349-246) | Career Total W/L | 58.57% (41-29) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Chadaj vs J. E. Ziverts Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Adam Chadaj has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jonas Eriksson Ziverts has won 45.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Adam Chadaj, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jonas Eriksson Ziverts has won 49.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Adam Chadaj has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonas Eriksson Ziverts has saved 58.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Adam Chadaj has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jonas Eriksson Ziverts winning 50.00% (W/L 6/6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Adam Chadaj has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 96/65), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Jonas Eriksson Ziverts has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 15/9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/5).
- Player level: In the last year, Adam Chadaj has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jonas Eriksson Ziverts has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 6/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Adam Chadaj winning 1 times and Jonas Eriksson Ziverts being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Adam Chadaj winning 2 and Jonas Eriksson Ziverts winning 0.
- The last match between Adam Chadaj and Jonas Eriksson Ziverts was at the Poland F2 (Gdynia), 20-06-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Adam Chadaj getting the victory 7-5 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Adam Chadaj has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jonas Eriksson Ziverts has played against players with an average rank of 408.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Adam Chadaj has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonas Eriksson Ziverts has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Adam Chadaj has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonas Eriksson Ziverts has converted 36.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Adam Chadaj vs Jonas Eriksson Ziverts Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Chadaj vs J. E. Ziverts H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:16:0 | Average Match Time | 2:16:0 |
| 67% (54/81) | 1st Serve % | 60% (53/88) |
| 59% (32/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (26/53) |
| 44% (12/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (17/35) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (5/14) |
| 51% (45/88) | Return Points Win % | 46% (37/81) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Chadaj 0%, Ziverts 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Chadaj 0%, Ziverts 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Chadaj 0%, Ziverts 58%.
A. Chadaj Recent Matches Played
J. E. Ziverts Recent Matches Played

A. Chadaj vs J. E. Ziverts Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.66% (349/246) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.57% (41/29) |
| 57.80% (774/565) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.13% (87/68) |
| 53.64% (6471/5593) | Games Win/Loss | 52.82% (777/694) |
| 59.63% (96/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.50% (15/9) |
| 59.38% (212/145) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.53% (23/15) |
| 53.95% (41/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 67 | Aces Total | 163 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 222 | Total Double Faults | 138 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:6:4 |
| 47.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 470.03 |
| 60% (2324/3862) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1842/2902) |
| 63% (1464/2324) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1205/1842) |
| 45% (685/1538) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (497/1060) |
| 48% (205/425) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (125/304) |
| 44% (1622/3691) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1212/3003) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 100.00% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.67% (10/14) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.09% (94/90) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 63.52% (242/139) | Futures W/L | 60.94% (39/25) |
| 59% (344/581) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (41/70) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (65/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (14/22) |
| 50% (76/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (10/15) |
| 89% (343/305) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (42/39) |
| 11% (343/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (42/3) |
| 17% (252/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (28/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:00 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.48
W2
2.43
10:10 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.65
W2
2.08
06:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.49
05:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
3.34
W2
1.27
03:00 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
3.2
W2
1.29
02:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.8
W2
1.37
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal